Walnut Mountain Road--1983
----
Ever get one of these?
FlickrMail
From: | FlickrHQ |
---|---|
Subject: | You have been banned from the Nature No Limits Group |
Hi - |
Sort of overwhelms the soul to know I have been rejected by a group that has such high standards.
Got the invite to join this rather plain-jane group yesterday morning from one of my Flickr contacts. Looked it over, joined, and posted one photo of a squirrel. Later, I received the above message.
It isn't the first time I've been banned from such as these. I once received an invite from an artsy-fartsy group, took a look at what the administrator liked, and posted one of my B&W photos that seemed like it might fit the overall theme. Other members must have liked the pic, because I got some nice comments from a few of them. Later that same day, I was banned... forever. I sent an email to the person who invited me to the group asking why. She checked on it and the administrator told her my photo just didn't meet the high standards she had set for the group. She didn't say why I was terminally banned. I went to the administrator's photostream, and found that just about any silly thing I have ever posted was much better than her best shots. She was just a wannabe. I did get the last laugh, though. The administrator must have forgotten who I was, because a few months later she listed me as a contact and nicely commented on one of my photos. Of course I immediately blocked her from commenting on any of my photos.
Crap, I've never claimed to be an artist, and I never will because I ain't one. If one thinks he is an artist, he should put his work before the art community and have it judged by other artists and people whom enjoy fine art. Flickr is not the place for such, especially when one bans other people's work because group members like it. Flickr was, is, and probably shall forever be a photo sharing community. Nothing more. I know many will disagree with this, but they have the right to be wrong.
Even though the little formal training I've had in photography is in photographic art, I still have a difficult time accepting that photography should be included in the fine arts. Of course, there were and are some great photographic geniuses, and I dearly love their work, but I accept it as it is, not what others want it to be.
----
2 comments:
Hi
There are some very ... uh.. unusual people on these photo upload sites. With the numbers of 'photo sharers' on Flickr it will never be a site that is truly about photography. You are, of course, absolutely right about that.
Don't sweat the small stuff... or the small minded people. In fact, you have probably received a badge of good humor and honor for having been blocked and banned by such a one.
There ... my rant is over.
Loved reading about the nurses and you now have your Carolyn on day and nite duty. :))
keep well
Maggie
Hi, Maggie.
A bit of clarification. There ARE some great photographers on Flickr; people like yourself that are dedicated to getting it done to the best of their ability and presenting some wonderful and beautiful photos. Is it art? Actually, I suppose it is because a lot of time and care went into making the work outstanding. Is the best photography fine art? I'm not saying it isn't. When I look at paintings of old Dutch masters, and about anything from the Illuminated Bibles of the Middle Ages to Renaissance and on through the Imperessionists, it takes my breath away. MOST photographs don't have that effect on me.
Neither you nor I are a part of the mainstream Flickr because for one thing, the site wasn't designed for people over 50. We ain't cool, hip, in, or whatever. We plug along doing our best and appreciating each other's efforts. Actually, I work at being a long tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs; I like to challenge the chairs.
Thanks Maggie; you are one of my best friends and you help keep my feet on the ground.
Ken
Post a Comment